Last data update: May 13, 2024. (Total: 46773 publications since 2009)
Records 1-3 (of 3 Records) |
Query Trace: Baty SA[original query] |
---|
Factors associated with receipt of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) monovalent and seasonal influenza vaccination among school-aged children: Maricopa County, Arizona, 2009-2010 influenza season
Baty SA , Ayala A , Odish M , Cadwell BL , Schumacher M , Sunenshine RH . J Public Health Manag Pract 2013 19 (5) 436-43 CONTEXT: To target school-aged children (SAC), who were identified as a priority for pandemic 2009 Influenza A (pH1N1) vaccination, Maricopa County (MC) initiated school-based influenza vaccination in 69% of its 706 schools during the 2009-2010 influenza season. OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with receipt of pH1N1 monovalent and 2009-2010 seasonal influenza vaccination among SAC and evaluate the association of school-based vaccination with vaccination status of SAC. DESIGN: Random-digit dialing was used to survey 600 MC households with willing adult participants and children grades K-12. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with pH1N1 and seasonal vaccine receipt. SETTING: Arizona. PARTICIPANTS: Household adults with children grades K-12. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Characteristics of children, parents, and households were obtained. RESULTS: Among 909 SAC, 402 (44%) received pH1N1 and 436 (48%) received seasonal vaccination. Factors associated with pH1N1 vaccination included vaccine availability at school (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-2.7), high-risk medical condition in child (AOR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.4-4.0), elementary versus high school attendance (AOR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.0-2.7), and seasonal influenza vaccination (AOR: 10.0; 95% CI: 6.4-15.6). Factors associated with seasonal vaccination included Hispanic ethnicity (AOR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1-4.2), health insurance coverage (AOR: 4.8; 95% CI: 1.7-13.7), elementary versus high school attendance (AOR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0-2.5), and pH1N1 vaccination (AOR: 10.5; 95% CI: 6.7-16.6). CONCLUSIONS: Availability of pH1N1 vaccine at school was independently associated with pH1N1 vaccination of MC school-aged children. School-based influenza vaccination campaigns should be considered to increase vaccination among this population. |
Evaluation for West Nile Virus (WNV) RNA in urine of patients within 5 months of WNV infection.
Baty SA , Gibney KB , Staples JE , Patterson AB , Levy C , Lehman J , Wadleigh T , Feld J , Lanciotti R , Nugent CT , Fischer M . J Infect Dis 2012 205 (9) 1476-7 Gibney et al recently reported finding no West Nile virus (WNV) RNA in urine samples collected from 40 patients at 6.5–6.7 years after acute WNV disease [1]. These findings were in contrast to Murray et al, who detected WNV RNA in urine samples collected from 5 of 25 patients (20%) at 1.6–6.7 years after their initial infections [2]. We present results from a prospective evaluation of WNV RNA in urine specimens collected from 63 persons within 5 months after their acute WNV infection. | During the 2010 WNV outbreak in Maricopa County, Arizona, we identified persons with laboratory evidence of acute WNV infection, including detection of WNV immunoglobulin M antibodies in serum or cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients with a clinically compatible illness or WNV RNA in serum samples from asymptomatic blood donors. Information on demographic characteristics, medical history, current medications, and clinical illness was obtained by medical record review and interview with patients or their surrogate. A urine sample was collected during a site visit. The study was approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS) human subjects review boards, and participants provided informed consent before enrollment. |
Variations in positive predictive values for rapid influenza tests for 2009 pandemic influenza A (pH1N1)-Arizona, April-October 2009
Baty SA , D'Souza A , Sunenshine R , Bisgard K , Erhart LM . J Public Health Manag Pract 2012 18 (3) 268-71 CONTEXT: Rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) are used for influenza screening, clinical decision making, and influenza surveillance. In August 2009, a hospital reported increased false-positive RIDT results to the Arizona Department of Health Services. Because of reported RIDT low sensitivities (40%-62%) for 2009 pandemic influenza A (pH1N1), the hospital's report raised further concerns about the specificity and clinical utility of RIDTs. OBJECTIVE: To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of RIDTs compared with real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay (rRT-PCR) using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) protocols and primers as a standard. DESIGN: A standardized survey collected information including RIDT brand/lot number, training of personnel performing test, type of laboratory, swab and specimen type, time from collection to testing, sample storage, and viral transport medium. SETTING: Arizona. PARTICIPANTS: Seven Arizona laboratories submitted positive RIDT clinical samples to Arizona State Public Health Laboratory (ASPHL) for confirmatory rRT-PCR testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The PPV was calculated on the basis of rRT-PCR-positive results for April through October. RESULTS: Results from 600 specimens using 1 of 4 RIDTs were available. Median pH1N1 PPV was 80% (range: 62%-91%) when calculated by RIDT brand. A significant difference in PPV was identified between the 2 largest facilities, which used the same RIDT brand, BinaxNOW Influenza A&B, (Laboratories A, 33% and B, 92%, [P < .01]). The facilities reported similar testing practices except lot numbers used and timing of testing. Laboratory A used lot 003684 and performed testing within 1 hour of collection; Laboratory B used multiple lots, excluding lot 003684, and performed testing within 24 hours. Laboratory A switched RIDT brands and noted a significant PPV increase from 33% to 91% (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Wide PPV variability combined with documented low sensitivity among RIDTs for pH1N1 diagnosis increases concerns about their specificity and clinical and epidemiologic utility for influenza. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:May 13, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure